CHOICE Arrangements: Myths vs. facts for small and mid-sized employers | hioscar Blog | Oscar
CHOICE Arrangements: Myths vs. facts for small and mid-sized employers
Considering a CHOICE Arrangement (formerly ICHRA) for your business? We debunk 6 common myths to help you manage health costs and improve employee benefits.
Employee Health BenefitsBroker Updates and Resources
7 min read
Share article
For many small and mid-sized business owners, managing health benefits often feels like an uphill battle. You’re balancing the need to offer high-quality support to your team with the stress of navigating unpredictable annual renewals and rising premiums. It’s an unavoidable liability that can feel impossible to control.
But what if you could shift your benefits strategy from an unpredictable expense to a strategic, fixed asset?
That’s where CHOICE Arrangements (formerly ICHRA) come in. A CHOICE Arrangement is an employer-funded health benefit that reimburses employees for individual health insurance premiums and eligible medical expenses. Instead of offering a traditional group plan, employers provide a tax-free allowance that employees can use to purchase the health insurance coverage that best fits their needs.
“One of the options available to you is [a CHOICE Arrangement],” said John Gallagher, vice president and employee benefits consultant at USI Insurance Services (opens in new tab), in a video (opens in new tab) he posted to LinkedIn. Before you jump to conclusions, I was a skeptic too, years ago. But I can tell you there has been a ton of momentum in that space. The structure has been built out, and there are lots of options available that make this a much more viable and lucrative opportunity for employers. I have clients that are doing exceptionally well with this – not just in containing costs but in providing choice and options to employees.”
This shift to a defined contribution model is gaining serious policy momentum, too. With state legislatures (Indiana, Mississippi) passing supportive bills and bipartisan backing at the federal level, policymakers are increasingly validating CHOICE as a sustainable, long-term solution for employer-sponsored coverage.
Because this approach is a departure from the status quo, questions and skepticism are to be expected. To help you cut through the noise, we’ve debunked the most common myths surrounding CHOICE using industry data and facts.
Myth 1: CHOICE shifts too much complexity and risk to employees
The facts: While critics argue that asking employees to shop for their own insurance is overwhelming, the reality is that many employees prefer this level of autonomy. More importantly, employees feel equipped to make those choices. The share of employees who feel confident selecting a health plan on their own has surged from 74% in 2024 to 88% in 2026. Consumers also have access to increasingly supportive tech, from AI-powered personal recommendations to easy comparison tools, making independent shopping easier today than it’s ever been before.
Traditional group plans often force a diverse workforce into a single plan that may not meet everyone’s needs. On the other hand, CHOICE transforms employees from passive recipients of a company-chosen plan into empowered healthcare consumers. By choosing their own plans on the individual market, employees can select coverage that includes their preferred doctors and aligns with their personal health needs and budget. Research indicates 94% of U.S. workers want more insurance choices and 55% of health plan members are dissatisfied with their current employer-sponsored health coverage.
Myth 2: CHOICE only works for small businesses
The facts: CHOICE Arrangements are highly scalable and technically can be used by employers of all sizes, from small startups to large, established enterprises with multi-state and distributed workforces. Because CHOICE Arrangements allow for flexible job-based class structures, larger organizations can offer tailored benefit strategies to specific groups of employees based on criteria like job classification, geography, or full-time status.
Myth 3: CHOICE creates an unequal benefits experience
The facts: In a group plan, all employees generally access the same coverage, which supporters say provides consistency. However, this approach lacks the flexibility to meet the varied needs of a modern, multi-generational, or remote workforce. Research finds that 60% of workers are interested in making the switch to an individual model (opens in new tab).
The core value proposition of CHOICE is personalization. By moving away from one-size-fits-all plans, employees can shop for coverage that fits their specific stage of life or health status, rather than being locked into a single, potentially ill-fitting network selected by their employer. This flexibility allows companies to support their teams more effectively than a group plan could.
Myth 4: CHOICE is just a way for employers to cut benefits
The facts: While critics argue that employers use CHOICE Arrangements primarily to cap costs, this model represents a shift toward a stable, predictable benefits strategy rather than a reduction in benefits. Traditional group plans often subject employees to the volatility of annual rate hikes, which frequently leads to employers passing those costs on to their teams or cutting coverage.
CHOICE transforms the healthcare benefits experience. Instead of being locked into a one-size-fits-all plan, employees gain the autonomy to choose coverage that aligns with the care they actually use and their preferred doctors. This allows for a more personalized, sustainable benefit experience, with companies that have made the switch seeing healthcare costs decrease by 15.5% on average.
Predictable costs: Unlike traditional group health plans that often face unpredictable annual premium hikes, CHOICE allows employers to set a fixed, monthly reimbursement amount, creating a stable and predictable benefits budget.
Choice: Employees choose individual plans that fit their specific needs, often leading to better satisfaction and health outcomes. Employees can even select different plans for each dependent.
Attracting talent: Offering CHOICE can make a small business more competitive by providing personalized health care options tailored to individual needs.
Reduced administrative burden: CHOICE Arrangements generally require less administrative work for an HR team than managing a traditional group plan.
Portability: Employees can keep the same plan even if they move to another job.
No minimum participation Unlike traditional group plans, CHOICE Arrangements can be offered regardless of employee count, making them accessible to small businesses.
Myth 5: Individual market plans have inferior coverage
The facts: All plans sold on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace are required to cover 10 essential health benefits, such as emergency services, hospitalization, maternity care, and mental health services. Beyond meeting these required benefit coverage standards, the individual market offers a vast diversity of plans designed for specific health needs, such as Oscar’s diabetes plans. Some of these plans are issued by the same major insurance carriers that offer group plans, utilizing the same provider networks. The perception of them being lower quality is a misunderstanding; the lower price point is frequently a result of greater market efficiency and government subsidies, not a reduction in medical care standards.
Myth 6: The individual market is too unstable for business planning
The Facts: Concerns about the stability of the individual (ACA) market are common, but it is important to look at the structural design of that market. The individual market uses a risk-adjustment system designed to balance financial performance across insurers. This redistribution mechanism helps stabilize pricing and discourages plans from cherry-picking members, creating a risk pool that is often broader and more diverse than what a single employer could manage on their own.
The individual market has also matured into a highly competitive environment. Between 2020 and 2023, the ACA marketplace became 3.5x more competitive, offering hundreds of plans per market, significantly outpacing the stagnant employer market, which typically provides just 1-3 generic options. While no market is immune to fluctuations, the individual market offers stability because it allows employers to avoid the unpredictable annual renewals of the employer market and instead plan for the long term with greater clarity. Combined with growth to over 24 million lives, this scale provides a level of cost predictability and stability that traditional small group plans simply cannot match.
CHOICE Arrangements offer a way to provide meaningful, personalized health support that aligns with the realities of modern business budgets and the needs of a diverse workforce. As with any major business change, the key is evaluating whether this model aligns with the specific needs of your employees and your long-term goals.
Thinking about a different approach to health benefits? See how Oscar can help you take the next step. Get started.
Oscar Medical coverage is underwritten by Oscar Insurance Company and its affiliates. Administrative Services for all plans provided by Oscar Management Corporation. All insurance policies and group benefit plans contain exclusions and limitations. For availability, costs, and complete details of coverage, contact Oscar at 855-672-2788.
